Biconical Antenna vs Discone - What is the difference?

Last Updated May 25, 2025

A biconical antenna offers broadband performance with nearly constant impedance over a wide frequency range, making it ideal for accurate measurements and signal testing. Explore the rest of the article to understand which antenna suits your specific needs and applications best.

Comparison Table

Feature Biconical Antenna Discone Antenna
Design Two identical conical conductors facing each other Disc top with cone-shaped bottom conductor
Frequency Range Wideband; typically 1:10 frequency ratio Ultra-wideband; typically 1:10 to 1:20 frequency ratio
Impedance Typically 50 Ohms Typically 50 Ohms
Radiation Pattern Omnidirectional in H-plane Omnidirectional in horizontal plane
Gain Moderate (around 3-5 dBi) Low to moderate (around 2-4 dBi)
Polarization Linear Linear
Applications EMC testing, broadband communication VHF/UHF scanners, broadband receivers, monitoring
Size Compact but larger than discone at low frequencies Compact, suitable for handheld devices
Construction Complexity Moderate Simple

Introduction to Biconical and Discone Antennas

Biconical antennas consist of two conical conductive elements, providing broad bandwidth and omnidirectional radiation patterns ideal for wideband communication and EMC testing. Discone antennas feature a disc over a cone structure, offering ultra-wideband performance with low VSWR, making them suitable for monitoring and scanning applications. Both antenna types excel in wide frequency coverage but differ in design and specific use cases.

Basic Design and Structure Comparison

Biconical antennas feature two symmetrical conical conductors extending from a common apex, providing broad bandwidth and omni-directional radiation patterns, ideal for wideband applications. Discone antennas consist of a disc atop a cone-shaped reflector, offering ultra-wideband performance with a low-profile design and excellent vertical polarization. Your choice depends on specific frequency range needs and physical constraints, as biconical antennas typically excel in uniform radiation patterns, while discone antennas prioritize compactness and ease of installation.

Frequency Range and Bandwidth Efficiency

Biconical antennas typically offer a wider frequency range, efficiently covering from low VHF to UHF bands, making them suitable for broadband applications. Discone antennas excel in ultrawide bandwidth efficiency, often achieving a usable frequency range from 25 MHz up to several GHz with relatively consistent performance. Both antenna types provide broad frequency coverage, but discones generally outperform biconicals in bandwidth flatness and omnidirectional radiation patterns.

Radiation Pattern Differences

Biconical antennas exhibit a nearly omnidirectional radiation pattern in the horizontal plane with a broad vertical beamwidth, making them suitable for wide-angle coverage and frequency ranges from VHF to UHF. In contrast, discone antennas offer a more uniform omnidirectional pattern with slightly narrower vertical beamwidth, optimized for ultra-wideband applications from VHF through microwave frequencies. The biconical design provides better vertical polarization and gain at lower angles, whereas the discone emphasizes consistent gain and impedance stability across its wide frequency spectrum.

Performance in VHF and UHF Bands

Biconical antennas provide a more uniform radiation pattern and wider bandwidth, making them highly effective for VHF and lower UHF frequencies, especially in applications requiring consistent omnidirectional coverage. Discone antennas excel in ultra-wideband performance, particularly in UHF bands, offering strong impedance matching and better gain at higher frequencies. Your choice will depend on the specific frequency range and coverage requirements, with biconical types favored for smoother VHF/UHF transitions and discones suited for broad UHF frequency ranges.

Installation and Space Requirements

Biconical antennas require precise alignment and often more mounting height to achieve optimal performance, making installation slightly more complex in constrained spaces. Discone antennas feature a compact, vertically oriented design, enabling easier installation on limited or crowded rooftops without extensive structural support. Space efficiency favors discone antennas for urban or confined environments, while biconical antennas might demand larger clearances for effective radiation patterns.

Applications and Use Cases

Biconical antennas excel in broadband applications such as electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing and wideband signal reception due to their stable gain and uniform radiation pattern. Discone antennas are preferred for wideband VHF/UHF communication systems, including scanning receivers and amateur radio, offering omnidirectional coverage with simple construction. Choosing between the two depends on Your need for frequency range consistency or compact design in specific communication or testing scenarios.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Biconical antennas offer a wide bandwidth and relatively stable impedance, making them ideal for broadband applications like EMC testing, yet they are bulkier and more complex to fabricate than discone antennas. Discone antennas provide ultra-wideband coverage with simple construction and low cost, but they exhibit less gain and reduced efficiency at lower frequency ranges compared to biconical types. The choice between biconical and discone antennas depends on the specific frequency range, gain requirements, and physical size constraints of the intended application.

Durability and Maintenance

Biconical antennas boast a robust design with fewer moving parts, resulting in higher durability and lower maintenance requirements compared to discone antennas. Discone antennas, while offering broad bandwidth, often feature more complex components that may be prone to wear and require more frequent inspection and upkeep. Both antenna types perform well in harsh environments, but biconical antennas generally deliver longer service life with reduced maintenance costs.

Choosing the Right Antenna for Your Needs

Selecting the right antenna depends on your specific application, with biconical antennas offering wideband performance ideal for EMC testing and frequency range from 20 MHz to 3 GHz. Discone antennas provide ultra-wideband coverage, typically from 25 MHz to 1.3 GHz, making them suitable for radio scanning and monitoring tasks. Your choice should consider frequency range, gain, and directional requirements to optimize signal reception and transmission efficiency.

biconical antenna vs discone Infographic

Biconical Antenna vs Discone - What is the difference?


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about biconical antenna vs discone are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet