Biconical Antenna vs Discone Antenna - What is the difference?

Last Updated May 25, 2025

A biconical antenna offers a broad bandwidth and omnidirectional radiation pattern ideal for wideband applications, while a discone antenna provides ultra-wideband performance with a simpler, more robust design preferred for scanning and monitoring frequencies. Explore the rest of the article to understand which antenna best suits your specific communication needs.

Comparison Table

Feature Biconical Antenna Discone Antenna
Frequency Range Wideband, typically 30 MHz to 3 GHz Very wideband, typically 25 MHz to 1.3 GHz
Radiation Pattern Omnidirectional in the horizontal plane Omnidirectional in the horizontal plane
Polarization Linear polarization Vertical linear polarization
Gain Moderate gain (around 2-5 dBi) Low to moderate gain (approximately 0-3 dBi)
Impedance Typically 50 ohms Typically 50 ohms
Size & Structure Two conical elements facing each other Disc over cone structure
Applications EMC testing, broadband measurements, air traffic control Wideband communication, monitoring, frequency scanning
VSWR Performance Typically 1.5:1 or better across bandwidth Typically 1.5:1 or better across bandwidth

Introduction to Biconical and Discone Antennas

Biconical and discone antennas are broadband antennas commonly used for wideband applications such as EMC testing and spectrum monitoring. Biconical antennas consist of two conical metal elements, providing a uniform radiation pattern and stable impedance over a wide frequency range, typically from 30 MHz to 3 GHz. Your choice between these antennas depends on specific needs; biconicals offer better radiation pattern control, while discones provide broader frequency coverage and omni-directional properties.

Design and Structural Differences

Biconical antennas feature two conical conductors that create a symmetrical, broadband design with a smooth impedance curve, ideal for wide frequency ranges from VHF to UHF. Discone antennas consist of a disc and a cone element, forming an omnidirectional design optimized for ultra-wideband performance, typically covering frequencies from 25 MHz to several GHz. Your choice depends on the specific frequency spectrum and radiation pattern requirements, as biconical antennas offer better gain and pattern stability, while discones provide simpler construction and wider bandwidth.

Frequency Range and Bandwidth Comparison

Biconical antennas typically offer a broad frequency range, often covering from VHF to UHF bands (30 MHz to 3 GHz), with a relatively consistent impedance and radiation pattern across the spectrum. Discone antennas provide an even wider bandwidth, commonly from 25 MHz up to 1.3 GHz or higher, making them ideal for applications requiring ultra-wideband coverage with moderate gain and omnidirectional radiation. The discone's design inherently supports greater bandwidth than the biconical, which often results in more versatile performance in frequency-sensitive uses like scanning and monitoring.

Radiation Pattern Variations

Biconical antennas exhibit a broad, nearly omnidirectional radiation pattern in the horizontal plane with moderate gain, making them ideal for wideband applications requiring consistent coverage. Discone antennas provide a more uniform omnidirectional pattern with wider bandwidth and lower VSWR, often favored for applications demanding stable omni coverage over ultra-wide frequency ranges. Understanding radiation pattern variations between these antennas helps you select the best option for reliable signal reception or transmission in your specific frequency spectrum.

Efficiency and Performance Metrics

Biconical antennas exhibit higher broadband efficiency with uniform radiation patterns, making them suitable for precise electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing and antenna calibration across wide frequency ranges. Discone antennas offer wider bandwidth but trade off some efficiency, resulting in slightly less consistent gain and higher voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) over frequency. Performance metrics such as gain stability, antenna efficiency, and VSWR highlight the biconical's superior accuracy while discone antennas excel in versatile, general-purpose broadband applications.

Installation and Space Requirements

Biconical antennas require more precise installation due to their larger size and need for stable mounting, often demanding more vertical and horizontal space. Discone antennas are compact and easier to install, with a design that allows flexible mounting options in tight areas. Your choice depends on available space and installation constraints, with discones offering a more space-efficient solution for limited environments.

Typical Applications for Each Antenna

Biconical antennas are typically used in electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing and wideband radio frequency (RF) communication due to their broad frequency range and stable radiation pattern. Discone antennas excel in applications requiring wideband omnidirectional coverage, such as VHF/UHF scanning, public safety communications, and amateur radio. Both antennas are favored for broadband use, but biconical antennas are preferred in controlled test environments, while discones are deployed in field applications needing robust, consistent signal reception.

Pros and Cons: Biconical vs. Discone

Biconical antennas offer wide bandwidth and excellent omnidirectional radiation patterns, making them ideal for broadband applications and frequency sweeps. However, they tend to be larger and less mechanically robust compared to discone antennas, which are more compact, durable, and easier to mount. Discone antennas provide excellent wideband performance with a lower noise figure but may have slightly reduced gain and efficiency compared to biconical types at certain frequencies.

Cost and Availability Considerations

Biconical antennas generally have a higher manufacturing cost due to their complex design and materials, making them less readily available compared to discone antennas. Discone antennas feature simpler construction and widespread availability, often resulting in lower prices and easier procurement for general wireless and radio applications. The cost-effectiveness and accessibility of discone antennas make them a preferred choice for budget-conscious users requiring broad frequency coverage.

Choosing the Right Antenna for Your Needs

Biconical antennas offer wideband frequency coverage and high radiation efficiency, making them ideal for applications requiring broad frequency response, such as EMC testing and spectrum monitoring. Discone antennas provide omnidirectional patterns with excellent frequency range and durability, suited for general communication and scanning purposes. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize bandwidth and signal clarity (biconical) or ruggedness and omnidirectionality (discone).

biconical antenna vs discone antenna Infographic

Biconical Antenna vs Discone Antenna - What is the difference?


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about biconical antenna vs discone antenna are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet