Microstrip Patch vs Printed Dipole - What is the difference?

Last Updated May 25, 2025

Microstrip patch antennas offer compact size and easy integration with planar circuits, ideal for applications requiring low-profile designs, while printed dipole antennas provide wider bandwidth and better radiation efficiency, making them suitable for broadband uses. Explore the rest of the article to discover which antenna best fits your specific communication needs.

Comparison Table

Feature Microstrip Patch Printed Dipole
Structure Planar rectangular/square patch on dielectric substrate Two symmetrical conductive arms printed on substrate
Operating Frequency Typically microwave frequencies (1 GHz to 40 GHz) Wide frequency range, common in VHF to microwave (30 MHz to 6 GHz)
Polarization Linear, can be designed for circular polarization Typically linear polarization
Bandwidth Narrow to moderate (usually a few percent) Moderate to wide bandwidth (5%-20%)
Gain Moderate, typically 6-9 dBi Lower to moderate, around 2-5 dBi
Radiation Pattern Broadside, directional Bidirectional, figure-8 shape
Feeding Methods Microstrip line, coaxial probe, aperture coupling Direct feed or via microstrip line
Size Compact, size dependent on wavelength and substrate permittivity Generally larger than patch at same frequency
Applications Mobile communications, satellite, radar, WLAN, GPS Wireless communications, RFID, sensors, dipole arrays
Ease of Fabrication Simple PCB process, widely used in planar antennas Very simple, minimal layers required

Introduction to Microstrip Patch and Printed Dipole Antennas

Microstrip patch and printed dipole antennas are widely used in modern wireless communication due to their compact size and ease of fabrication on printed circuit boards (PCBs). Microstrip patch antennas typically consist of a metallic patch on a grounded substrate, offering directional radiation patterns and low profile suitable for integration in mobile devices. Printed dipole antennas, formed by two conductive elements on a PCB, provide simpler design and broader bandwidth, making them ideal for applications requiring omnidirectional coverage and easy impedance matching.

Fundamental Operating Principles

Microstrip patch antennas operate by radiating electromagnetic waves through a metallic patch suspended over a ground plane, using a dielectric substrate to form a resonant cavity. Printed dipole antennas consist of two conductive elements that act as half-wave resonators, directly converting RF signals into radiated waves without a ground plane dependency. Understanding your application's frequency, bandwidth, and radiation pattern requirements helps determine whether microstrip patch or printed dipole antennas offer better performance.

Design and Fabrication Techniques

Microstrip patch antennas are typically designed using planar layers on a dielectric substrate with photolithographic processes for precise patterning, allowing compact and low-profile fabrication. Printed dipole antennas rely on etched conductive traces on flat substrates, emphasizing simpler geometries and ease of integration with feeding networks through standard PCB manufacturing. Your choice between these designs impacts fabrication complexity, cost, and performance based on substrate materials, antenna dimensions, and production scalability.

Bandwidth and Frequency Performance

Microstrip patch antennas typically offer narrower bandwidth compared to printed dipole antennas, which provide broader frequency performance ideal for wideband applications. The bandwidth of microstrip patches is often limited by their resonant nature, making them suitable for specific frequency bands within microwave ranges, typically 1-10 GHz. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize broad frequency coverage with printed dipoles or compact, directional gain with microstrip patches.

Radiation Patterns and Gain Comparison

Microstrip patch antennas typically exhibit a directional radiation pattern with moderate gain ranging from 6 to 9 dBi, making them ideal for point-to-point communication. Printed dipole antennas offer a broader, more omnidirectional radiation pattern with lower gain, usually between 2 to 5 dBi, suitable for wide-area coverage. Your choice between these antennas should consider whether focused signal strength or coverage area is the priority for your application.

Polarization Characteristics

Microstrip patch antennas exhibit predominantly linear polarization with options for circular polarization through design modifications like truncating corners or employing dual feeds. Printed dipole antennas typically provide linear polarization aligned along the dipole axis but can be configured for dual or circular polarization with complex feed structures. Your choice depends on the specific polarization needs of your wireless communication system for optimal signal reception.

Size, Weight, and Profile

Microstrip patch antennas offer a compact size and low profile, making them ideal for applications requiring lightweight and space-efficient solutions. Printed dipole antennas generally occupy a larger footprint but maintain a thin profile, which slightly increases overall weight compared to microstrip patches. The microstrip patch's integration on a single dielectric substrate contributes to its minimal thickness and reduced weight, whereas printed dipoles often require more extensive laminate areas, influencing size and bulk.

Material Selection and Substrate Impact

Microstrip patch antennas typically utilize low-loss dielectric substrates like Rogers RO4003C or FR4 to enhance bandwidth and efficiency, while printed dipole antennas favor substrates with stable dielectric constants and minimal thickness to maintain impedance consistency. The dielectric constant and loss tangent of the substrate directly affect the resonant frequency, radiation efficiency, and bandwidth of both antenna types, with patch antennas being more sensitive to substrate permittivity variations. Using materials with low dielectric loss and tailored permittivity ensures improved performance and reduced signal attenuation in microstrip patches and printed dipoles, optimizing their respective applications in wireless communication systems.

Applications in Modern Wireless Systems

Microstrip patch antennas are widely used in modern wireless systems for applications requiring compact, low-profile designs such as mobile devices, GPS, and satellite communications due to their ease of integration with printed circuit boards. Printed dipole antennas offer superior bandwidth and radiation efficiency, making them ideal for high-frequency applications like 5G wireless networks and RF identification (RFID) systems. Both antenna types are crucial in achieving reliable wireless connectivity, with microstrip patches favored for size-constrained environments and printed dipoles preferred for broadband and high-performance requirements.

Advantages and Limitations: Microstrip Patch vs Printed Dipole

Microstrip patch antennas offer compact size, low profile, and ease of integration into printed circuit boards, making them ideal for modern wireless devices, but they typically suffer from narrow bandwidth and lower gain. Printed dipole antennas provide broader bandwidth and higher radiation efficiency, improving overall signal quality, yet they can be larger and less aesthetically suitable for sleek device designs compared to microstrip patches. Your choice depends on specific application requirements, balancing the trade-off between size constraints and performance needs.

microstrip patch vs printed dipole Infographic

Microstrip Patch vs Printed Dipole - What is the difference?


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about microstrip patch vs printed dipole are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet