Asynchronous Buck vs Synchronous Buck - What is the difference?

Last Updated May 25, 2025

Synchronous buck converters utilize a dedicated MOSFET for the low-side switch, improving efficiency by reducing conduction losses compared to asynchronous buck converters, which rely on a diode for this role. Understanding the differences in efficiency, complexity, and cost can help you choose the best option for your power supply design; read on to explore these aspects in detail.

Comparison Table

Feature Synchronous Buck Converter Asynchronous Buck Converter
Switching Elements Two MOSFETs (High-side and Low-side) One MOSFET (High-side) + Diode (Low-side)
Efficiency Higher efficiency at low voltage and high current due to reduced conduction losses Lower efficiency due to diode conduction losses
Cost Higher cost due to second MOSFET and control complexity Lower cost, simpler design
Complexity More complex control circuitry needed for synchronous switching Simpler control, easier implementation
Thermal Performance Better thermal performance due to reduced power losses More heat generated in diode, may require better cooling
Input Voltage Range Suitable for low voltage, high current applications Suitable for moderate power levels and applications where efficiency is less critical
Applications Smartphones, computers, high-efficiency DC-DC converters General-purpose power supplies, low-cost designs

Introduction to Buck Converter Topologies

Synchronous buck converters use MOSFETs for both the high-side and low-side switches, improving efficiency by reducing conduction losses compared to asynchronous buck converters, which rely on a diode for the low-side switch. Your choice between these topologies impacts power efficiency, thermal performance, and complexity in DC-DC voltage regulation applications. Key factors include switching frequency, load conditions, and the desired balance between cost and energy efficiency.

What is a Synchronous Buck Converter?

A synchronous buck converter is a type of DC-DC converter that uses two MOSFETs, a high-side and a low-side switch, instead of a diode for rectification, improving efficiency by reducing power loss. This design enables the converter to achieve higher efficiency, especially at low output voltages and high current loads, due to lower conduction losses compared to asynchronous buck converters that use a diode. Synchronous buck converters are widely used in applications requiring precise voltage regulation and enhanced power efficiency, such as in modern computing and telecommunications equipment.

What is an Asynchronous Buck Converter?

An asynchronous buck converter is a type of DC-DC step-down regulator that uses a single power MOSFET switch and a diode for energy transfer, offering simpler design and lower cost compared to synchronous buck converters. It operates by switching the MOSFET on and off to regulate output voltage, with the diode providing the freewheeling path during the off phase. While asynchronous buck converters are less efficient at low voltages due to diode conduction losses, they remain popular in applications where cost and simplicity are prioritized over maximum efficiency.

Key Differences Between Synchronous and Asynchronous Buck

Synchronous buck converters use two MOSFETs for switching, improving efficiency by reducing conduction losses, while asynchronous buck converters rely on one MOSFET and a diode, leading to higher power dissipation. You benefit from synchronous buck designs in applications demanding higher efficiency and thermal management, as the synchronous rectification minimizes energy loss during switching. Key differences include cost, efficiency, and complexity, where asynchronous buck converters offer simplicity and lower cost but sacrifice performance under heavy load conditions.

Efficiency Comparison: Synchronous vs Asynchronous Buck

Synchronous buck converters achieve higher efficiency than asynchronous buck converters by replacing the diode with a controlled MOSFET, reducing conduction losses and enhancing power conversion performance. In low-voltage, high-current applications, synchronous designs can improve efficiency by 5-10% compared to asynchronous models due to lower forward voltage drops and reduced heat dissipation. Your choice between these topologies should consider the efficiency gains relative to complexity and cost for your specific power management needs.

Cost Analysis of Synchronous and Asynchronous Designs

Synchronous buck converters generally exhibit higher initial costs due to the integration of MOSFETs for both high-side and low-side switches, which enhance efficiency but increase component expenses. Asynchronous buck converters use a diode for the low-side switch, reducing component cost and simplifying design at the expense of lower efficiency and increased heat dissipation. The total cost analysis must balance upfront component prices with potential long-term savings from improved efficiency and thermal management.

Thermal Performance and Power Losses

Synchronous buck converters typically offer superior thermal performance due to lower conduction losses, as both switches are controlled MOSFETs with minimal voltage drop. Asynchronous buck converters use a diode for the lower switch, which introduces higher conduction losses and increases heat dissipation, reducing efficiency. Optimizing your design with synchronous buck topology can significantly reduce power losses and manage thermal challenges more effectively in high-current applications.

Application Suitability and Use Cases

Synchronous buck converters excel in applications requiring high efficiency and improved thermal performance, such as in computer motherboards, smartphones, and high-performance power supplies. Asynchronous buck converters are better suited for low-cost, low-power applications like battery chargers and simple DC-DC conversion tasks where efficiency is less critical. Your choice depends on efficiency needs and cost constraints, with synchronous designs favored for high-current scenarios and asynchronous for simpler, budget-conscious projects.

Selection Criteria for Synchronous or Asynchronous Buck

Synchronous buck converters offer higher efficiency and better thermal performance due to their integrated low-side MOSFET, making them ideal for applications requiring low voltage ripple and high load currents. Asynchronous buck converters, which utilize an external diode, provide simpler design and reduced cost, suiting low-power or less efficiency-critical applications. Your choice depends on factors like efficiency targets, cost constraints, complexity tolerance, and the specific load requirements.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Buck Converter

Synchronous buck converters offer higher efficiency by using MOSFETs for both the high-side and low-side switches, reducing power loss and heat generation compared to asynchronous buck converters that rely on diodes for the low-side switch. Your choice depends on application requirements--synchronous designs excel in low-voltage, high-current scenarios due to better efficiency and thermal performance, while asynchronous converters are simpler, cost-effective, and suitable for less demanding power budgets. Evaluate factors like efficiency, cost, complexity, and thermal management to select the optimal buck converter for your power supply needs.

synchronous buck vs asynchronous buck Infographic

Asynchronous Buck vs Synchronous Buck - What is the difference?


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about synchronous buck vs asynchronous buck are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet