Electrochemical Gas Sensor vs Infrared Gas Sensor - What is the difference?

Last Updated May 25, 2025

Infrared gas sensors detect gases by measuring the absorption of infrared light wavelengths specific to target gases, offering high selectivity and long lifespan without consumption of sensing material. Electrochemical gas sensors rely on chemical reactions between the gas and electrodes to generate a measurable current, providing excellent sensitivity and fast response for toxic gases; discover which technology suits Your application by exploring the detailed advantages and limitations in the rest of this article.

Comparison Table

Feature Infrared Gas Sensor Electrochemical Gas Sensor
Detection Principle Measures gas absorption of infrared light Measures current from chemical reaction with gas
Target Gases Hydrocarbons, CO2, CH4 CO, H2S, NO2, O2
Sensitivity High for specific gases High for toxic gases at low concentrations
Response Time Fast (seconds) Very fast (seconds to minutes)
Lifespan Long (years) Limited (1-2 years)
Calibration Requires periodic calibration Requires frequent calibration
Cross-Sensitivity Low cross-interference Prone to cross-sensitivity
Operating Conditions Unaffected by humidity or temperature Sensitive to humidity and temperature
Power Consumption Moderate Low
Cost Higher Lower

Introduction to Gas Sensing Technologies

Infrared gas sensors detect gases by measuring the absorption of specific infrared light wavelengths, offering high sensitivity for hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide detection. Electrochemical gas sensors operate by producing an electrical current through chemical reactions with target gases, making them suitable for detecting toxic gases like carbon monoxide and oxygen levels. Your choice depends on the application requirements such as gas type, accuracy, response time, and environmental conditions.

How Infrared Gas Sensors Work

Infrared gas sensors detect specific gas molecules by measuring the absorption of infrared light at characteristic wavelengths, utilizing non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) technology. These sensors emit infrared light through a gas sample, and the amount of light absorbed correlates directly with the gas concentration, providing fast and accurate detection. You benefit from their long lifespan and minimal interference compared to electrochemical gas sensors, which rely on chemical reactions to measure gas levels.

How Electrochemical Gas Sensors Operate

Electrochemical gas sensors detect gases by converting the chemical reaction between the target gas and an electrode into an electrical signal proportional to the gas concentration. They consist of a working electrode, counter electrode, and electrolyte, where the target gas diffuses to the working electrode and undergoes oxidation or reduction. This chemical interaction generates a measurable current that directly correlates with gas concentration, enabling precise detection of toxic gases like carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide.

Key Differences: Infrared vs. Electrochemical Gas Sensors

Infrared gas sensors detect gases by measuring the absorption of infrared light at specific wavelengths, making them highly effective for identifying hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide with long-term stability and minimal calibration needs. Electrochemical gas sensors rely on chemical reactions at the sensor's electrode to generate an electrical signal proportional to gas concentration, offering high sensitivity and selectivity for toxic gases like carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide but with a limited lifespan. Your choice between these technologies depends on the specific gas to be detected, environmental conditions, and maintenance preferences.

Sensitivity and Selectivity Comparison

Infrared gas sensors offer high sensitivity and selectivity for detecting gases like CO2 and hydrocarbons by measuring specific wavelengths absorbed by gas molecules, resulting in minimal interference from other gases. Electrochemical gas sensors excel in detecting toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide with high sensitivity but may experience cross-sensitivity effects from similar gases, affecting selectivity. Your choice depends on the target gas and environmental conditions, as infrared sensors provide robust selectivity for stable gases, while electrochemical sensors deliver precise detection for trace toxic compounds.

Applications: Best Uses for Each Sensor Type

Infrared gas sensors excel in detecting hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide, making them ideal for applications in industrial safety, environmental monitoring, and leak detection in oil and gas facilities. Electrochemical gas sensors are best suited for measuring toxic gases like carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, and oxygen depletion, often used in confined space monitoring, medical diagnostics, and indoor air quality assessments. Selecting the right sensor depends on your specific gas detection needs and the environmental conditions of the application.

Accuracy and Response Time Analysis

Infrared gas sensors offer high accuracy in detecting specific gases like carbon dioxide and hydrocarbons, with response times typically under 10 seconds due to their optical measurement principles. Electrochemical gas sensors excel in detecting toxic gases such as carbon monoxide, providing rapid response times often within seconds and high sensitivity at low concentrations. Your choice depends on the target gas and required detection speed, as infrared sensors deliver stable, long-term accuracy while electrochemical sensors offer faster detection for immediate hazard response.

Maintenance and Lifespan Considerations

Infrared gas sensors typically require less frequent maintenance due to the absence of chemical reagents and have a longer lifespan, often exceeding 5 years under normal operating conditions. Electrochemical gas sensors experience gradual depletion of reactive materials, leading to a limited lifespan of 1 to 2 years and necessitate regular calibration and sensor replacement to maintain accuracy. Maintenance costs for infrared sensors are generally lower, making them more suitable for long-term monitoring applications with minimal downtime.

Cost and Budget Implications

Infrared gas sensors generally have higher upfront costs due to advanced optical components but offer lower maintenance expenses and longer operational lifespans, making them cost-effective for continuous monitoring of gases like methane and carbon dioxide. Electrochemical gas sensors are more affordable initially, suited for budget-sensitive projects, but they require frequent replacement of sensing electrodes and calibration, which increases long-term operational costs. Budget planning should account for total cost of ownership, considering factors such as sensor durability, maintenance frequency, and accuracy requirements to optimize investment in gas detection technology.

Choosing the Right Gas Sensor for Your Needs

Infrared gas sensors excel at detecting hydrocarbons and gases like carbon dioxide with high accuracy and resistance to sensor poisoning, making them ideal for industrial safety and environmental monitoring. Electrochemical gas sensors offer precise measurements for toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide, featuring low power consumption and compact size suitable for portable or wearable devices. Your selection should consider the specific gas type, environmental conditions, response time, and maintenance requirements to ensure optimal sensor performance and safety.

infrared gas sensor vs electrochemical gas sensor Infographic

Electrochemical Gas Sensor vs Infrared Gas Sensor - What is the difference?


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about infrared gas sensor vs electrochemical gas sensor are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet